|
Share of obligation by Ivan Donn Carswell
If the debate rages in the pages of the news today then I’m confused, I’ve searched and found no evidence. Perhaps the anger of some residents about a Catholic school that’s due to close because its roll has fallen lower than the threshold for support is not the sort of news that sells. That only tells me why it isn’t there. I heard it on the breakfast show, a couple disembodied voices arched in anger, discussing choices, arguing pros and cons until the show moved on. Am I wrong to labour on the point? The closure of a school disjoints the fabric of its neighbourhood, it isn’t good, the issue is a moot of course – forever in dispute. So let us take a neutral stance, was it an act of governance? Or just an oversight of parents passing in the night? It’s not a symptom of the first, I’m sure; the bureaucrats who hold the purse disport themselves with thorough care, no error there unless they changed the basic rules and never said. And that they never did. So where can one assign the blame? It’s not as if this came out of the blue, their teachers knew as good, committed teachers always would, so how they could discuss the case and miss the point in team debate, not try to be proactive and precise, just sit and wait for providence, or just be nice and negligent, or argue with a precedent that holds for all denies their share of obligation. Their school will close for lack of diligence on part of people meant to take an active role and seek solutions to resolve their shared duty of care, the answer’s there, and if they had the issue would be dead. Instead we have debate about a school’s avoidable fate which condemns apathetic commitment to their children’s education. Let’s hope it’s not a symptom common throughout our Nation. © I.D. Carswell
|
|