|
What does it take? by Ivan Donn Carswell
Is the current rate of global warming a serious and cogent warning? Do we need to think about the fact that higher tides will drown Pacific island states within a year or two, or do we listen to the loosely spewed claptrap backed by pseudo-scientists (who say with fervent ease that it’s all happened before, a cyclic phenomenon which is basically benign and not to worry please)? Yeah, sure, the weather’s been great although the recent storms were a pest, it could rain a little more, particularly in the storage dams or out West where it hasn’t rained for years, and the best thing that could happen would be we get back to the weather patterns of twenty years ago, or more. For sure. And some guy who studies the thermocline produces a thermo-geomorphologic guide, a train timetable, saying we’ve got years before, well, certainly not this Century, any catastrophic event will inundate Mexico City, Moscow or Sydney. I’m relieved, only trains don’t read, they ride the rails we construct. The next event down that track is on rails set up by a warm snap one hundred years or more in making, perhaps that’s why the islanders are shaking sand off their tapa mats, readying for mass exodus. In the meantime we calmly use dirty energy, release greenhouse gas through industrial expansion fuelled by exponential population growth driven by expansionist economies without fear of intelligent intervention or reprieve? Please, what does it take to make the picture clearer? © I.D. Carswell
|
|