It’s a ruling from the field of pain (devoid of antique nave, a judgement process aptly named ‘benefit of doubt’); you’ve encountered it without veneer in waning times where referees decline to rule on what is dreamed – where benefits per se are favoured the brave.
I endeavoured to design a way to aid our weekly match, no doubt with good intent and purest mind – at least back at the start. Innovation breaks the heart of game tradition in disquieting ways, ways which players will oppose without resort to reason. So this treasonous design was surely fated.
My fortunes are rebated on a biased plane, I cannot gain a fair review or claim immunity from moral prosecution; the worst solution for my team is to regress to ancient plays, old established ways and though I’ve done no wrong the longer that I think of it the more depressed I judge our chances of success.
So here we are; it distress me you cannot see it like I do, object on any grounds you can except you can’t deny it really works. The crazy thing’s a masterpiece of mad design (entirely mine), aided by an upholsterer who cruelly placed eccentric studs to frustrate you.